Watch The Hunley Online Mic
Halls Fountain City Shopper News 0. Shopper News. Halls Fountain City Shopper News 0. Published on Apr 7, 2. A great community newspaper serving Halls and Fountain City. Transcript of New Orleans Mayor Landrieus address on Confederate monuments. I was able to find more time to reply. Please understand that I am replying to your arguments and not to you. If I slip into anyting that appears to be a personal attack, please do correct me. I agree with most of what you have written here, Stephen, but dont be baited to move your position too far. If you say that slavery was an integral part of the causes of the Civil War, and that slavery was is dehumanizing, and even that to justify slavery, many wealthy white folks resorted to white supremacyblack inferiority positions I am with you. If, however, you are saying any of these I disagree 1 Slavery in and of itself was the primary cause of the Civil War I disagree. Black chattel slavery was the primary cause of the American Civil War ACW in this fact there would be no southern rebellion without slaver states attempting for decades prior to the ACW to enforce the acceptance of slavery upon all America, and without slaver states beginning their formal secession even prior to Lincolns inauguration. The Union returned fire from Fort Sumter by going all in to re capture the treasonous states. There would be no ACW had slavery not been the underlying principle of the Southern economy. Did the North declare that the extirpation of black chattel slavery was the primary reason for the battle, at any timeJust hours before workers removed a statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee the fourth Confederate monument to be dismantled in New Orleans in recent. Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get. Ball-Engineer-Hydrocarbon-Hunley-15.jpg' alt='Watch The Hunley Online Mic' title='Watch The Hunley Online Mic' />Not to my knowledge. I think that even at the end, it was Union Forever, Hurrah boys, hurrah Down with the traitors, up with the stars and note the plural form it was to re assert the principle of federalism and unionisms. When the traitorous state governments were overthrown and the new Unionist governments were installed, the rebellious states were rejoined to the Union. White plantation way of life. Not sure what you are arguing here. That the South was uniquely founded on the principle of white supremacy and the eternal bondage of innocent black Africans to work and labor and die for the profit of white slavers and the society that benefited from black chattel slavery
1 I celebrate myself, and sing myself, And what I assume you shall assume, For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. I loafe and invite my soul. Well, yes, I agree. I dont use plantation, however. I use forced labor camp and prison, because I wont whitewash what happened. The main reason the Southern states seceded was because they hated people of color and wanted to punish them, and the Northern states would not allow this If I have ever said this, I was wrong. If I have ever implied this, I was unclear. It is utterly irrelevant whether Southern states and I think you mean, the white people of the Southern states hated people of color or wanted to punish them. Watch Cobra Verde HD 1080P. There are plenty of mixed race babies from the 4. Cid New Full Episode 2014 Free Download. Women who have their ovaries removed are more likely to suffer mental decline in old age. The procedure, which triggers the menopause, is often carried out on. U. S. President Donald Trump announced recently a new American strategy for the countrys longest war Afghanistan. The major change is a shift from the deadlines. Retrouvez toutes les discothque Marseille et se retrouver dans les plus grandes soires en discothque Marseille. Many famous people, including Thomas Jefferson, loved their slaves and had multiple children by them. Children they put right into slavery, of course. Love and hate are not useful here. Actions are. I dont think the Northern states would not allow the South to be hateful towards black Africans. The primary focus of the political and economic North was to keep the Union. The moralistic underpinnings of the ACW according to the North only slowly became tied to abolitionism, even though there was a tiny minority declaring the immorality of black chattel slavery. John Brown and Nat Turner didnt start the war with their moralistic cries about the wickedness of black chattel slavery and a white slaver society. South Carolina did that by trying to break up the Union. The Civil War was simple in its development and the conflicts between the North and South began with, and consisted mainly about, slavery Your word simple is doing a lot of work here. Social structures are complex because people are complex. Many things tie people together in communities and governments and states and nations. There were conflicts between various factions, North and South, Slaver and Free. Heck, people are complex Jefferson and Madison and Washington could make various grand statements about human freedom and dignity and own slaves. Occasionally they might write something like I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just that his justice cannot sleep forever, and be in the position of raping his black property, as did Jefferson. But absent white supremacy, a white slaver society and economy, and the very real fact of black chattel slavery, there would never be an American Civil War. There would have been no passionate defense of secondary issues. Tariffs and states rights would have simply been arguments that would lead to negotiations and perhaps even some resolutions. The underlying principle of two systems under one house fighting against each other for their essentialism was the cause, and when the South, by reason of South Carolinas foolish bombardment of Fort Sumter, threw its lot in with the rebels, the two system government was replaced by a one system government, and the underlying principle for the two system government was black chattel slavery and white slavers. People in the North were less biased or hateful towards people of color than were people in the South Again, I am not arguing this. There were many race riots in the North. In 1. 74. 1 New York City burned alive black Americans and hung others because of the rumors of a black American rebellion against white supremacy in the North. There is no implication that the North was good and the South was bad. There is the direct statement that a government that attempts to enforce and elevate white slavers and white supremacy, however, is wicked. Always. The North was not then, and is not now, simon pure in its motivations and actions. The American colonies used black chattel slaves stolen from Africa for their profit and expansion. The North, however, was simply freer to abandon its reliance upon legal slavery. Not free of all evil. The Norths political will was firmly anti slave, while the Souths political will was uniformly pro slave No one I know, and not I, argues that the North was pure in one direction and the South pure in another. There were many loyalists and Unionists in the South who were not consulted regarding the rebellion, and who were later hounded, attacked, and killed for their support of Unionism and even freedom for black human beings. There was a colony of German Americans in Texas, for example, that was attacked and some killed because they attempted to resist the slaver rebellion. The argument isnt that the North was pure in its motives. The argument is that the North was Unionist and gradually incorporated the extirpation of black chattel slavery. The three Civil War Amendments were passed largely by the North which required their state legislatures to approve the amendments, leading to my belief that the North at least acknowledged that black chattel slavery and black disenfranchisement was wrong, even though they were still sympathetic to white supremacy. Fighting for, or supporting the Southern states during the attempted secession makes you more of a bigot than fighting for the Northers states This isnt a useful argument. The claim is that fighting for the Southern rebellion means fighting to support the Southern rebellion, a rebellion based upon white supremacy, white slavers running the political and economic and even spiritual systems, and the eternal enslavement of black Africans here in America since the very beginnings of the American colonies. There might be people with high minded principles, but those principles were not the reasons for the rebellion, and those high minded principles were not embodied in the governments and the Constitution and secession documents of the Southern states. Slavery was the underlying principle. Being a leader in the South means you were an unprincipled man gender bias intentional Unprincipled implies not acting according to your principles, no They were not doing that. They were, in my opinion, showing their true principles.